A long-standing ESPN show, "Around the Horn," is set to conclude its run shortly. The decision to end this program stems largely from its overt left-leaning political stance, which alienated a significant portion of sports fans. Over the past five years, nearly all panelists have been outspoken advocates for radical-left ideologies, save for perhaps Frank Isola. In an attempt to celebrate the show’s legacy, ESPN invited former employees Jemele Hill and Kate Fagan back for a farewell episode, alongside Justin Tinsley, whose recent writings criticized Philadelphia Eagles’ running back Saquon Barkley for associating with President Donald Trump.
The final episodes of "Around the Horn" were marked by discussions that highlighted the show's consistent ideological leanings. Among these was a column by Justin Tinsley criticizing Saquon Barkley's association with President Trump, suggesting it undermined democratic values. Meanwhile, Kate Fagan utilized her platform on the show to advocate for transgender children in sports, emphasizing their right to participate without restriction based on gender identity. Her argument centered around the emotional and social benefits of playing sports, asserting that these experiences transcend traditional gender boundaries.
In one of the concluding episodes, Fagan delivered a prepared statement during her segment, reinforcing the show's reputation for promoting specific political viewpoints. She argued that sports should be inclusive spaces that welcome diverse voices and perspectives, reflecting broader societal values such as joy and humanity. Despite claims of promoting diversity, critics argue that the show lacked diversity of thought, often featuring panelists who echoed similar opinions.
Fagan's return underscored the themes that defined "Around the Horn." Her advocacy for transgender rights in sports exemplified the show's commitment to addressing social issues through a sports lens. While she championed inclusivity and belonging, detractors pointed out the importance of maintaining distinctions in competitive environments to ensure fairness across genders.
As "Around the Horn" concludes, it leaves behind a complex legacy. While it sought to elevate underrepresented voices and highlight important social issues within the context of sports, it also faced criticism for its lack of ideological diversity. Ultimately, the show's end marks a transition in how sports media engages with broader cultural debates, leaving room for new approaches and conversations in the future.